Skip to content

DOC: move release note for #36175 #36363

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

simonjayhawkins
Copy link
Member

@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins added this to the 1.1.3 milestone Sep 14, 2020
@simonjayhawkins
Copy link
Member Author

test failures. restarting ci

=========================== short test summary info ===========================
FAILED pandas/tests/plotting/test_groupby.py::TestDataFrameGroupByPlots::test_series_groupby_plotting_nominally_works
ERROR pandas/tests/io/json/test_pandas.py::TestPandasContainer::test_to_s3 - ...
= 1 failed, 75229 passed, 1809 skipped, 1180 xfailed, 6 xpassed, 67 warnings, 1 error in 1769.60s (0:29:29) =

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Fixed regressions
- Fixed regression in :class:`IntegerArray` unary plus and minus operations raising a ``TypeError`` (:issue:`36063`)
- Fixed regression in :meth:`Series.__getitem__` incorrectly raising when the input was a tuple (:issue:`35534`)
- Fixed regression in :meth:`Series.__getitem__` incorrectly raising when the input was a frozenset (:issue:`35747`)
- Fixed regression in :meth:`read_excel` with `engine="odf"` caused ``UnboundLocalError`` in some cases where cells had nested child nodes (:issue:`36122`, and :issue:`35802`)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

double-ticks around engine=odf?

(:issue:36122, and :issue:35802) -> (:issue:36122,:issue:35802)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @jbrockmendel for the comments. This PR is to sync the whatsnew on master and 1.1.x if I make changes to 1.1.3 (requested above) this will require a backport and with changes to 1.2 whatsnew in this PR an auto backport will fail. will split into 2 PRs.

@@ -315,7 +315,6 @@ I/O
- :meth:`to_csv` did not support zip compression for binary file object not having a filename (:issue: `35058`)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you're inclined to fix the extra space after :issue: i wouldnt complain

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants